<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Agent Starting Pitcher Rankings &#8211; 2010 Diamondback Possibilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/</link>
	<description>The happenings of the Arizona Diamondbacks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:54:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TS Garp</title>
		<link>http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>TS Garp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbacksvenom.com/?p=380#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I hear you on the risk, but it seems like given the DBacks situation, they can afford to roll the dice a bit.  If Duke or Sheets pan out, that means they&#039;ll potentially have 3 of the best SP&#039;s in the NL, which could also mean that they&#039;re making a run at the division title.  If they pan out and the team still isn&#039;t doing great, you can flip them for promising prospects.  And it&#039;s not likely that either will demand a long-term contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you on the risk, but it seems like given the DBacks situation, they can afford to roll the dice a bit.  If Duke or Sheets pan out, that means they&#8217;ll potentially have 3 of the best SP&#8217;s in the NL, which could also mean that they&#8217;re making a run at the division title.  If they pan out and the team still isn&#8217;t doing great, you can flip them for promising prospects.  And it&#8217;s not likely that either will demand a long-term contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Lal</title>
		<link>http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Lal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbacksvenom.com/?p=380#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Duke and Sheets have a lot of upside, but they both have lots of risk.  I&#039;m afraid the D&#039;backs will spend their money on a healthy, mediocre pitcher rather than on a risky, but better one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duke and Sheets have a lot of upside, but they both have lots of risk.  I&#8217;m afraid the D&#8217;backs will spend their money on a healthy, mediocre pitcher rather than on a risky, but better one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TS Garp</title>
		<link>http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>TS Garp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbacksvenom.com/?p=380#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Duchscherer or Sheets seem to make the most sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duchscherer or Sheets seem to make the most sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newportnik</title>
		<link>http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>newportnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbacksvenom.com/?p=380#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I think Sheets can be good when healthy, and I don&#039;t trust Penny still. His time with the Red Sox and Dodgers showed that he is not as good as he once was. Marquis would be okay for the D&#039;backs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sheets can be good when healthy, and I don&#8217;t trust Penny still. His time with the Red Sox and Dodgers showed that he is not as good as he once was. Marquis would be okay for the D&#8217;backs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Lal</title>
		<link>http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Lal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbacksvenom.com/?p=380#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid they won&#039;t go for one of the top guys, like Wolf, Lackey, or Harden.  I think guys like Marquis or Penny are more likely.  I&#039;d also like them to take a chance on Ben Sheets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid they won&#8217;t go for one of the top guys, like Wolf, Lackey, or Harden.  I think guys like Marquis or Penny are more likely.  I&#8217;d also like them to take a chance on Ben Sheets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newportnik</title>
		<link>http://dbacksvenom.com/2009/11/11/free-agent-starting-pitcher-rankings-2010-diamondback-possibilities/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>newportnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbacksvenom.com/?p=380#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Who do you think is the best pitcher in the D&#039;Backs price range? Do you think they&#039;ll go after a top of the rotation guy (Harden, Lackey) or someone in the middle like Piniero?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who do you think is the best pitcher in the D&#8217;Backs price range? Do you think they&#8217;ll go after a top of the rotation guy (Harden, Lackey) or someone in the middle like Piniero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
